Posted by
JDComments on Saturday, December 30, 2006 3:25:19 PM
Bill O'Reilly wondered last night who could possibly be against the execution of Saddam Hussein.
The answer is a resounding "The Left", as if that should come as a surprise to anyone who follows the follies of that delusional group who has advanced enough in the last 40 years that they no longer need to take hallucinogenics to attain a psychotic break- they now just live perpetually in that state.
See, your parents were right to warn you of the ongoing effects of using drugs.
In fact, not only do they find fault with the manner of his demise, they abhor the "show" trial that led up to it as explained in an
article in the Nation [I know, I shouldn't be reading obscene stuff like that, but every now and then I need comic relief]
Now the execution has already raised the hackles of many European and Religious leaders [see
article ] who just can't see past their ivy tower morality to realize that if he was allowed to live he would always be a potential hope to the insurgents,
But to criticize the trial by implying it was not fairly held indicates they believe he was not given ample opportunity to prove his
innocence. My question is who in their right mind believes
he was innocent?
In truth, it was a show trial in that there was no doubt as to his guilt, and therefore
nothing could be done to give the appearance that he might go free. However, that is not the fault of anyone but Saddam, who made his monstrous behavior all too evident during his reign of terror.
But the Left has taken this opportunity to once again besmirch what the US has wrought in Iraq, instead of hailing the demise of a brutal heinous dictator who tortured and oppressed millions of people for thirty years.
Some people are never happy.